Analisis Kesulitan Peserta Didik dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Perbandingan Senilai
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59108/ime.v3i1.69Keywords:
Kesulitan Peserta Didik, Metode Pengajaran, Perbandingan Senilai, Pendidikan MatematikaAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesulitan peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan masalah perbandingan senilai. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kasus yang bermula dari kesalahan yang dilakukan peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan masalah perbandingan senilai. Empat orang peserta didik dijadikan sebagai sampel teoretis dari 34 orang peserta didik kelas VII di SMP Negeri di Tasikmalaya, dengan tingkat kesalahan yang paling kompleks, mencakup: kesalahan dalam prosedur, penyelesaian yang tidak lengkap, dan kesalahan dari menentukan rumus matematika. Pengumpulan data dalam penelitian dilakukan dengan cara: tes tertulis, wawancara mendalam, dan observasi kelas. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian, meliputi: seperangkat soal tes matematika, kisi-kisi wawancara, serta lembar observasi. Analisis data dilakukan dengan teknik analisis tematik untuk mengidentifikasi tema-tema utama terkait kesulitan peserta didik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peserta didik mengalami kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan masalah perbandingan senilai, meliputi: (1) kesulitan memahami bahasa matematis, (2) kesulitan memahami soal cerita, (3) pengaruh kecemasan matematika, dan (4) perbedaan gaya belajar. Wawancara dan observasi kelas mengungkapkan bahwa faktor-faktor seperti metode pengajaran yang kurang variatif, kurangnya latihan yang kontekstual, dan motivasi belajar yang rendah turut berkontribusi terhadap kesulitan yang dialami peserta didik. Diskusi hasil penelitian menekankan pentingnya pendekatan pengajaran yang lebih interaktif dan kontekstual untuk meningkatkan pemahaman peserta didik terhadap konsep perbandingan senilai. Implikasi dari penelitian ini menunjukkan perlunya pengembangan materi ajar yang lebih inovatif dan penggunaan teknologi pendidikan untuk membantu peserta didik dalam mengatasi kesulitan tersebut.
References
Abulhul, Z. (2021). Teaching Strategies for Enhancing Student’s Learning. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i3.22
Alam, B. P., Lutvaidah, U., & Santosa, P. P. P. (2020). Students’ Error Analysis in Completing English Math Story Problems. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Folklore, Language, Education and Exhibition (ICOFLEX 2019), 370–374. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201230.069
Ali, S., Ali, I., & Hussain, S. (2021). Difficulties in the Applications of Tenses Faced by ESL Learners. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review (RJSSER), 2(1), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol2-iss1-2021(428-435)
Andrade, E. A. de O., Silva, I. P. da, & Pina, M. O. M. (2023). Digital Technologies In Mathematics Education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Debates, 4(01), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.51249/jid.v4i01.1255
Baidoo, J., & Ali, C. A. (2023). Students’ mathematics and real life contexts in solving algebraic word problems. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 483. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v14i2.19272
Burr, S. M. D. L., Xu, C., Li, H., Si, J., LeFevre, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). Fraction mapping and fraction comparison skills among grade 4 Chinese students: An error analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 1335–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12503
Cañizares, D. C., Poblete, R. K., & Pérez, N. E. (2022). Contribution of Attentional Networks to Basic Arithmetic Achievement in School-age Children. Psicología Educativa, 28(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a20
Castillo, S., & Fernández, C. (2022). Secondary School Students’ Performances on Ratio Comparison Problems. Acta Scientiae, 24(6), 60–88. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6834
Davis, E. (2022). The ratios debate. Early Years Educator, 23(12), 18–19. https://doi.org/10.12968/eyed.2022.23.12.18
Febrilia, Y., Adi, B. S., Amelia, M. A., Aminah, S., & Saputra, J. (2023). Understanding mathematical concepts of comparison materials based on webquiz. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 299. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v14i2.16969
Fitriani, Umar, K., Pasaribu, F., Novitasari, W., Sofyan Samosir, B., & . Y. (2023). Analysis of Difficulty Understanding Student Mathematica by Using Online Learning Model. KnE Social Sciences, 180–188. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i4.12898
Gijsbers, D., de Putter-Smits, L., & Pepin, B. (2020). Changing students’ beliefs about the relevance of mathematics in an advanced secondary mathematics class. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1682698
Herman, T., Rahmi, K., & Utami, N. S. (2022). Student learning obstacles in solving contextual mathematical problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2659(1), 040001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113653
Hidayat, E. I. F., Vivi Yandhari, I. A., & Alamsyah, T. P. (2020). Efektivitas Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Kelas V. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 106. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i1.21103
Hussein, Y. F., & Csíkos, C. (2023). The effect of teaching conceptual knowledge on students’ achievement, anxiety about, and attitude toward mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12938
Klados, M. A., Paraskevopoulos, E., Pandria, N., & Bamidis, P. D. (2019). The Impact of Math Anxiety on Working Memory: A Cortical Activations and Cortical Functional Connectivity EEG Study. IEEE Access, 7, 15027–15039. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2892808
Misra, P. K. (2021). Technology and Teaching. In Learning and Teaching for Teachers (pp. 181–198). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3077-4_11
Munasinghe, B., Bell, T., & Robins, A. (2021). Teachers’ understanding of technical terms in a Computational Thinking curriculum. Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Computing Education Conference, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441636.3442311
Ningrum, D. P. N., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2022). Students’ mathematical conceptual understanding: What happens to proficient students? AIP Conference Proceedings, 2566(1), 020017. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0116651
Nogues, C. P., & Dorneles, B. V. (2022). Cognitive skills as predictors of elementary students’ understanding of arithmetic concepts. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 28, e22037. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320220037
Pascual, E. A. (2022). Getting the Answer Exactly Right: Dealing with Math Misconception. International Journal of Research Publications, 93(1), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP100931120222745
Permatasari, S. A., & Prasetyawati, W. (2023). Efforts to Overcome Adolescent Academic Anxiety through Intervention Programs with a Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Approach. Bisma The Journal of Counseling, 7(1), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.23887/bisma.v7i1.58382
Ramadianti, W., Priatna, N., & Kusnadi, K. (2019). Misconception Analysis of Junior High School Student in Interpreting Fraction. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1159–1173. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.631567
Rauf, D. M. Bin, & Malik, H. (2022). A Critical Analysis of the Role of Teachers in Providing Professional Guidance to Students in Government Secondary Schools. Propel Journal of Academic Research, 1(2), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.55464/pjar.v1i2.16
Riaddin, D. (2022). The Effect of Learning Videos on Students’ Mathematical Abilities: A Meta-Analysis Study. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v11i2.11463
Roulston, S., Cowan, P., Brown, M., Austin, R., & O’Hara, J. (2019). All aboard or still at check-in? Teacher educators’ use of digital technologies: Lessons from a small island. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3785–3802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09951-x
Skulmowski, A. (2023). Do concreteness fading and guidance fading aid learning from perceptually rich visualizations? Changes in style lead to more cognitive load and interfere with learning. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 4, 100112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100112
Tazkiya, F. (2023). The Importance Of Mastering Mathematical Concepts In Solving Mathematical Problems In Elementary Schools. Ezra Science Bulletin, 1(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.58526/ez-sci-bin.v1i1.3
Zeljić, M., Dabić-Boričić, M., & Ilić, S. (2023). Second-graders’ understanding of comparison tasks. Inovacije u Nastavi, 36(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2301117Z
Zubaidi, A. M., & Velusamy, S. (2024). The Necessity of Educational Technology in Teaching Methods. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Sixth Edition (pp. 1–12). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch033
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Intellectual Mathematics Education (IME)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
