Legal Protection in Medical Disputes for Doctors in Relation to The Principle of Lex Specialist
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59108/ilre.v1i2.48Keywords:
Dispute, Doctor, Law, Medical, ProtectionAbstract
Health is one of the constitutional rights protected by law. The importance of health in everyday life makes many people hope to get a cure when they see a doctor. Patient expectations that differ from the results obtained sometimes lead to medical disputes. Conflicts that occur between doctors and patients if they cannot be resolved by mediation usually the patient or the patient's family will report to the authorities. Some law enforcers, in this case the police, still use the Criminal Code or Civil Code as the basis for charges without looking at other more specialised laws such as the Medical Practices Act (UUPK). The purpose of this thesis is to find out the procedures for legal protection for doctors in medical disputes and also to find out the application of the Lex Specialist principle of Article 79 letter (C) of the GCPL in relation to the lex generalis principle of the Civil Code in resolving medical disputes for doctors. This research uses a normative juridical approach and is analytically descriptive. From the results of this study, it can be concluded by the author that doctors will get legal protection in medical disputes if they have fulfilled administrative obligations, namely having STR and SIP as a condition for practicing medicine and performing actions according to SOPs, Professional Standards and conducting inform consent completely and clearly and filling out medical records in accordance with the actions performed.
References
Alfiyanti, D. G., Desyandri, & Erita, Y. (2022). Peran Filsafat Ilmu Dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD FKIP Universitas Mandiri, 8(2), 2343–2352. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v8i2.554
Ali, Z. (2010). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Astuti, E. K. (2009). Transaksi Terapeutik dalam Upaya Pelayanan Medis di Rumah Sakit. PT. Citra Aditya Bhkati.
Bimasakti, M. A. (2018). Onrechtmatig Overheidsdaad Oleh Pemerintah Dari Sudut Pandang Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan / Act Against the Law By the Government From the View Point of the Law of Government Administration. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 1(2), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.122018.265-286
Dahlan, S. (2006). Malpraktik Simposium Pencegahan Dan Penanganan Kasus Dugaan Malpraktik Cetakan ke 2 Proceeding IDI Wilayah Jawa Tengah. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gunawan, A. C. (2019). Tindakan Kedokteran Atau Consent ( Studi Rumah Sakit Ortopedi Diajukan Dalam Rangka Penyelesaian Studi Strata Satu ( S-1 ). Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Harahap, E. H., Istianingsih, N., & Latief, M. (2020). Perkembangan Filsafat Ilmu Dalam Perspektifteknologi Digital. Jurnal Administrasi Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.56957/jsr.v4i1.138
Jayanti, N. K. (2009). Penyelesaian Hukum Dalam Malapraktik Kedokteran. Pustaka Yustisia.
Kurnianingsih, W. (2020). Hubungan Pengetahuan Coder dengan Keakuratan Kode Diagnosis Pasien Rawat Jalan BPJS berdasarkan ICD – 10 Di Rumah Sakit Nirmala Suri Sukoharjo. Jurnal Manajemen Informasi Dan Administrasi Kesehatan (JMIAK), 3(01), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.32585/jmiak.v3i01.680
Manan, B. (2004). Hukum Positif Indonesia.
Mukhlis, M. (2022). Memahami Prosedur Pemberian Informed Consent Dalam Praktek Kedokteran. BPSDM Sulawesi Selatan.
Mulyani, F., & Haliza, N. (2021). Analisis Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi (Iptek) Dalam Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (Jpdk), 3(1), 101–109. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/89905436/pdf-libre.pdf?1660879627=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DAnalisis_Perkembangan_Ilmu_Pengetahuan_d.pdf&Expires=1702702481&Signature=fCQ1tVDRKtXqjsBTddrN2R0j1xSBi3C1vVSTJOeIhxmAxrF18io-74aUa1clbE38u0k6Rt304-jbeEXbi6QoNWR0Y-ZLrwQpxscXoAEtzwmB~8OGyg3kfL5~Tu1gR1xDAuyJhhQhnBs49IHElzr2Ff1-iWzkRkCzN0ljR3RJ1-ybB8LiyS8lMzg-sZYS26WWEK6~KeWGi3hVchkhRdGMx55c-v5C7~5tMsGqIZ0CSF9mrkDpuOnk4Llq7d5UlesXB94nvdTT-CtfJ06SJ2BrjxB2TqjmD3DIMnzLjRvEJb3VEBdpDsILqYqhmT6vJeRpZY-motWqoUrQwAkleA8sxQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
Perangin-Angin, N., Saragih, J., & Lismawati. (2023). Hubungan Dukungan Keluarga Dengan Harga Diri Pasien TB Paru Di Rumah Sakit Tentara IV Pemantang Siantar. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Dan Gizi (JIG), 1(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55606/jikg.v1i1.781
Ratman, D. (2012). Mediasi Nonlitigasi Terhadap Sengketa Medik dengan Konsep Win-Win Solution. PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Rewur, E., Rimbing, N., & Sumilat, V. V. (2021). Perlindungan dan Penegakan Hukum Bagi Dokter yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum. Lex Crimen, 10(6), 63–71.
Rustianto, E. (2005). Analisis Pemanfaatan Data Rekam Medis Untuk Statistik Rumah Sakit (Studi Rs.Bhakti Wira Tamtama Semarang Tahun 2004-2005) Analysis Of Medical Record Data Usage On Hospital Statistic (Study On Bhakti Wira Tamtama Hospital Semarang 2004-2005).
Sari, P. I., Hatta, G. R., & Nuraini, A. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Pengetahuan, Kepatuhan Dokter dan Peran Rumah Sakit Terhadap Kelengkapan Pengisian Berkas Rekam Medis Rawat Inap RSIA Brawijaya. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Administrasi Rumah Sakit Indonesia (MARSI), 7(4), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.52643/marsi.v7i4.3566
Soekanto, S. (1982). Kesadaran Hukum Dan Kepatuhan Hukum. Rajawali.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2006). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Persada.
Suhaymi, E. (2023). Rekonstruksi regulasi perlindungan hukum terhadap dokter dalam menangani kegawatdaruratan medis berbasis nilai keadilan. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.
Supriadi, W. C. (2001). Hukum Kedokteran Cetakan 1. Mandar Maju.
Suriaatmadja, T. T. (2007). Simposium Professionalisme Tenaga Medis Dalam Hukum Kesehatan. RS Pertamina.
Tamher, G., Saija, R., Anshary, M., & Labetubun, H. (2022). Penggunaan Persetujuan Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(11), 1103–1119.
Wiradharma, D. (1996). Hukum Kedokteran. Mandar Maju.
Yunanto, A., & Helmi. (2010). Hukum Pidana Malpraktik Medik. ANDI.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Intellectual Law Review (ILRE)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
-
The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
-
Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.












