Implications of the Expansion of Criminal Jurisdiction for State Sovereignty in Counter-Terrorism under the Criminal Code

Authors

  • Ihat Subihat Universitas Wiralodra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59108/ilre.v3i2.118

Keywords:

Criminal Jurisdiction, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, Indonesian Criminal Code, State Sovereignty, Terrorism

Abstract

The transnational nature of terrorism poses significant challenges to the traditional territorial concept of criminal jurisdiction and directly affects the principle of state sovereignty. The expansion of criminal jurisdiction under Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) raises legal questions regarding the extent to which a state may exercise jurisdiction in combating terrorism without infringing upon the sovereignty of other states. This study aims to analyse the implications of the expansion of criminal jurisdiction on state sovereignty in the context of counter-terrorism based on the 2023 KUHP and its conformity with principles of international law. This research employs a normative juridical method, using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through an examination of the 2023 KUHP, counter-terrorism legislation, and relevant doctrines and international legal instruments. The findings indicate that the expansion of criminal jurisdiction in the 2023 KUHP is not arbitrary but is grounded in the principles of active nationality, passive nationality, and the protection of state interests, all of which require the existence of a genuine legal link. Such expansion is primarily situated within the scope of jurisdiction to prescribe and is implemented subject to the principles of non-intervention and international legal cooperation. This study concludes that the expansion of criminal jurisdiction under the 2023 KUHP reconstructs the concept of state sovereignty in a functional and responsible manner, while simultaneously strengthening Indonesia’s position within the global counter-terrorism legal regime without undermining state sovereignty or human rights.

References

Andrade, F. de, & Calster, G. Van. (2024). Due Process-Protecting the Right to Fair Trial of Foreign Defendants in Cross-Border Proceedings: Comparing Practices, Investigating Conflicting Principles, and Searching for Common Standards. In Comparative Procedural Law and Justice.

Arnell, P., & Faturoti, B. (2023). The Prosecution of Cybercrime–Why Transnational and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Should be Resisted. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 37(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2022.2061888

Aryudhanty, D. D., Yen, L. T., & Chan, N. J. (2023). Pros and Cons of Application of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in International Law: Various Practices in Southeast Asian Countries. International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia, 2(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ildisea.v2i1.58389

Atmasasmita, R. (1997). Tindak Pidana Narkotika Transnasional dalan Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Boister, N. (2025). The ‘General Part’ of Transnational Criminal Law. European Journal of International Law, 36(2), 433–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaf025

Brown, R., & Alexander, M. (1994). Sovereignty in the Modern Age. Canada-United States Law Journal, 20, 273. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/canusa20&section=32

Colorio, M. (2024). The Aut Dedere Aut Judicare System for Crimes Against Humanity: A Critical but Missing Tool in the Fight Against Impunity. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqae003

Fernández-Sánchez, P. A. (2018). Universal Jurisdiction and Terrorism. Groningen Journal of International Law, 6(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.21827/5b51d5265a29d

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.

Koesrianti. (2021). Kedaulatan Negara: Menurut Hukum Internasional. Airlangga University Press.

Kusumaatmadja, M. (1976). Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Putra Abardin.

Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (edisi revisi). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Masyhar, A., Utari, I. S., Usman, & Sabri, A. Z. S. A. (2023). Legal Challenges of Combating International Cyberterrorism: The NCB Interpol Indonesia and Global Cooperation. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(2), 344–366. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.29668

Muladi, & RS, D. S. (2016). Kompleksitas Perkembangan Tindak Pidana dan Kebijakan Kriminal. Alumni.

Osak, W. T., Karisoh, F. M., & Lengkong, N. L. (2023). Yurisdiksi Universal dalam Mengadili KejahatanTerorisme menurut Hukum Pidana Internasional. Lex Crimen, 12(3), 1–9. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/48514

Putri, D. K. (2022). Urgensi Asas Subsider Pada Pengaturan Asas Universal dalam Rancangan Kitab-Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21456/vol%25viss%25ipp605-616

Resar, A. (2025). Self-Protection in World Society: Reformulating the Protective Principle in International Law. Yale Law Journal, 134(5), 1824–1889. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5202758

Rivanie, S. S. (2020). Pengadilan Internasional dalam Memberantas Tindak Pidana Terorisme: Tantangan Hukum dan Politik. Sovereign: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 2(3), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjih.v2i3.36

Rusadi, A., Lestarika, D. P., & Sary, W. E. (2025). Pengaruh Kedaulatan Negara dan Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional Terhadap Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Atas Kejahatan Internasional. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 1(3), 240–248. https://jurnal.globalscients.com/index.php/jkhpk/article/view/407

Ryngaert, C. (2015). Jurisdiction in International Law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.

Sallata, H. G. Y. (2023). Asas Universal Dalam Hukum Pidana Tiga Negara (Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Belanda, Dan Prancis) Universal Principles in the Criminal Laws of the Three Countries (Comparation of Indonesian, Dutch and France Criminal Law). Tri Panji Liberal Arts Journal, 2(1), 16–29. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Giovanny-2/publication/385781672_ASAS_UNIVERSAL_DALAM_HUKUM_PIDANA_TIGA_NEGARA_PERBANDINGAN_HUKUM_PIDANA_INDONESIA_BELANDA_DAN_PRANCIS/links/6734faa2f255d5728669cd4c/ASAS-UNIVERSAL-DALAM-HUKUM-PIDANA-TIGA-NEGARA-PERBANDINGAN-HUKUM-PIDANA-INDONESIA-BELANDA-DAN-PRANCIS.pdf

Saputra, M. F. Y., Gumelar, M. I., Arwam, R. Y., Gupawa, R. G., Prakita, S. A., Munthe, S. M., Sineri, T. A. N., Salsabila, U. H., Manurung, V. S., & Sinaga, W. S. (2023). Ancaman Kejahatan Transnasional Pada Kedaulatan Indonesia Serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keimigrasian. In PT Dewangga Energi Internasional. PT. Dewangga Energi Internasional.

Saul, B. (2008). Defining Terrorism in International Law. Oxford University Press.

Shaw, M. N. (2017). International Law (8th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Shurson, J. (2025). Investigative Jurisdiction: The Evolving Limits of Extraterritoriality in Transnational Digital Investigations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 74(3), 675–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589325100985

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Student, S. M., & Law, C. (2024). Examining the Impact of Implementing the Principle of “ AutDedere , Aut Judicare ” ( Extradite or Prosecute ) in Combating Impunity for Criminals Perpetrating International Crimes. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 3(1), 1–11. https://jlsda.com/index.php/lsda/article/view/57

Sucharitkul, S. (1987). International Terrorism and The Problem of Jurisdiction. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 14(2), 141–181. http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/sjilc14&section=16

Wei, X. (2024). Rule of law or not? A critical evaluation of legal responses to cyberterrorism in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 53, 105951. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105951

Downloads

Published

31-10-2025

Issue

Section

Articles